Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 1159320200220020163
Korean Journal of Vision Science
2020 Volume.22 No. 2 p.163 ~ p.171
Impact of Fixation Direction on Dynamic Accommodative Response
Kim Jae-Eun

Park Ye-Hyeon
Jo Ha-Won
Park Inn-Jee
Park Hyung-Min
Chu Byoung-Sun
Abstract
Purpose : The purpose of this study was to measure accommodative response when looking at different direction such as downgaze and sidegaze either right or left.

Methods : This study was performed with 13 adult males and females(22.40¡¾0.41 years old) no subject had ophthalmic surgery or disease and placed the targets at the primary, 10¡Æ and 20¡Æ sidegaze, 10¡Æ and 20¡Æ downgaze, The accommodative responses was measured by a open-field autorefractometer under the distances of 3 m, 1 m and 40 cm that enable consecutive measurement.

Results : In all gaze directions as distance became shorter the accommodative response increased. At each viewing distance 1m and 40 cm, the accommodative responses showed the peaks 1.09¡¾0.10 D in 10¡Æ and 2.04¡¾0.11 D in 20¡Æ downgaze. respectively, while the lowest accommodative responses were 0.44¡¾0.05 D and 1.54¡¾0.06 D in 20¡Æ and 10¡Æ sidegaze, which showed statistical differences(p£¼0.050). There were significant differences in each viewing direction except for in 10¡Æ and 20¡Æ sidegaze(p£¼0.050). The gaze direction and the accommodative responses were significantly different(p£¼0.050).

Conclusion : This study demonstrates that the accommodative responses vary with the gaze direction and gaze angle for the same modulating stimulus. Therefore, it is assumed that 20¡Æ downgaze makes the object sharper and minimizes the eye fatigue.
KEYWORD
Accommodation, Accommodative responses, Gaze direction
FullTexts / Linksout information
 
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)